Non-root screenshot app submitted to ADC 2? - Force Close most recent 30 from http://www.forceclose.com 2010-03-12T17:22:56Z http://www.forceclose.com/feeds/question/440 http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/rdf http://www.forceclose.com/questions/440/non-root-screenshot-app-submitted-to-adc-2 Non-root screenshot app submitted to ADC 2? Paolo Amoroso 2009-11-09T17:03:27Z 2009-11-09T22:05:59Z <p>Has any non-root Android screenshot application been submitted to Android Developer Challenge 2? If so, what is its name?</p> <p>I seem to have read about such a tool but I am no longer able to track the reference, and it didn't mention the name anyway. I do know that root privileges are required for this. But that application supposedly does not require a rooted device because it is able to get enough root privileges through some sort of Bluetooth loophole. If so, it is likely to depend on specific operating system versions.</p> http://www.forceclose.com/questions/440/non-root-screenshot-app-submitted-to-adc-2/441#441 Answer by efan78 for Non-root screenshot app submitted to ADC 2? efan78 2009-11-09T17:41:27Z 2009-11-09T17:41:27Z <p>Hi Paulo, I must admit I haven't heard of any non-root screenshot apps (even in ADC2), from what I understand from the Android Developers group etc... it's something that can't be done because of the way that Android was built, it needs the root permissions.</p> <p>Although I'm sure if someone else has heard of it they'll shout up!</p> http://www.forceclose.com/questions/440/non-root-screenshot-app-submitted-to-adc-2/443#443 Answer by Chuck for Non-root screenshot app submitted to ADC 2? Chuck 2009-11-09T22:05:59Z 2009-11-09T22:05:59Z <p>There is one, and it made it to Round 2. It's called Drocap. Very little info about it online. The speculation, though, is that while it does not require a rooted phone, it does take advantage of an exploit to gain root access. <a href="http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers/browse%5Fthread/thread/831fbbb3fefdcdee?pli=1" rel="nofollow">Here's some discussion of it</a>.</p>